INDQ vs. COWG

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a India Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while COWG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. INDQ is actively managed, while COWG is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWG.

Performance

INDQ vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INDQ

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWG

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 1.88%
• 6M: 6.70%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 1Y: 10.37%
• 3Y*: 22.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDQ vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	3.17%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	14.89%

Correlation

The correlation between INDQ and COWG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

INDQ vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COWG

COWG Risk / Return Rank: 21
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 18
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDQ vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDQ	COWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.92	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.77	—

Drawdowns

INDQ vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -6.55%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and COWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDQ	COWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-23.60%	+17.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-3.53%	-2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-3.26%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INDQ	COWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.86%	17.63%	+2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.86%	19.36%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	19.36%	+0.50%

INDQ vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDQ vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.37%	0.32%	0.40%	0.47%
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDQ and COWG in my portfolio?

INDQ and COWG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INDQ or COWG?

On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDQ or COWG?

COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDQ or COWG?

COWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.

What is the main difference between INDQ and COWG?

INDQ is categorized as India Equities, while COWG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.49% for COWG.