INDQ vs. GLIN
INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) are both India Equities funds. INDQ is actively managed, while GLIN is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for GLIN.
Performance
INDQ vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDQ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLIN
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 1Y
- -4.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
INDQ vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 3.17% |
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 10.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDQ and GLIN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDQ vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank
INDQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLIN
INDQ vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDQ | GLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.98 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDQ vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -6.55%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and GLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDQ | GLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -79.36% | +72.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -44.51% | +38.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -50.91% | +47.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility
INDQ vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDQ | GLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.86% | 18.14% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 18.34% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 23.65% | -3.79% |
INDQ vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDQ vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison
INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 0.86% | 0.84% | 3.58% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.42% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% |
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDQ and GLIN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLIN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLIN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.
GLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.82% for GLIN.
Find the right allocation for INDQ and GLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer