INDQ vs. COWZ
INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a India Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. INDQ is actively managed, while COWZ is passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
INDQ vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDQ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- —
INDQ vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 3.17% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDQ and COWZ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDQ vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
INDQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COWZ
INDQ vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDQ | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDQ vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -6.55%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDQ | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -38.63% | +32.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -1.72% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -4.79% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility
INDQ vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDQ | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.86% | 11.46% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 17.66% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 19.88% | -0.02% |
INDQ vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDQ vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.93% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDQ and COWZ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.
INDQ is categorized as India Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.49% for COWZ.
Find the right allocation for INDQ and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer