IMCV vs. IWM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCV returned 10.76%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for IWM. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IMCV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 20.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 10.76% annualized return and IWM not far behind at 10.63%.

IMCV

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 2.86%
• 6M: 13.16%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 1Y: 28.34%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: 10.76%
• ALL TIME*: 9.94%

IWM

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 13.45%
• YTD: 20.84%
• 1Y: 39.26%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: 10.63%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	$2.47M	$2.33M	$2.03M
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	$6.77B	$6.36B	$7.44B

IMCV vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	17.54%	13.52%	12.28%	11.89%	-6.98%	33.56%	-4.11%	24.72%	-10.93%	12.60%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	20.84%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and IWM is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004	0.85

The correlation between IMCV and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMCV vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCV	IWM
Financial Services	17.7%	18.3%
Industrials	11.6%	13.7%
Energy	11.4%	5.6%
Healthcare	10.3%	20.0%
Utilities	10.1%	2.9%
Technology	9.3%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	9.2%
Real Estate	5.5%	7.0%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.5%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.0%

Return for Risk

IMCV vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 92
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 85
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMCV	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.04	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	2.85	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.34	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	3.58	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.79	12.68	+3.11

IMCV vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCV	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.74%	-59.05%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.90%	-11.03%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-27.50%	+8.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	-31.91%	+12.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.33%	-41.13%	-5.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-1.41%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-10.71%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	3.11%	-1.31%

Volatility

IMCV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.99%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCV	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	4.21%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	14.13%	-5.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	19.36%	-7.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	22.50%	-5.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.55%	23.02%	-3.47%

IMCV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMCV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than IWM's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.80%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCV and IWM in my portfolio?

IMCV and IWM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCV or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to IMCV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IMCV or IWM?

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.76% vs 10.63% for IWM. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCV or IWM?

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCV or IWM?

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCV or IWM?

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.

What is the main difference between IMCV and IWM?

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.