IWM vs. IWN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN).
IWM and IWN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both IWM and IWN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWM or IWN.
Correlation
The correlation between IWM and IWN is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWM vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWM:
0.69
IWN:
0.46
IWM:
1.10
IWN:
0.80
IWM:
1.13
IWN:
1.10
IWM:
0.74
IWN:
0.71
IWM:
3.63
IWN:
2.27
IWM:
3.97%
IWN:
4.25%
IWM:
20.85%
IWN:
20.86%
IWM:
-59.05%
IWN:
-61.55%
IWM:
-8.18%
IWN:
-9.06%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than IWN's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IWM has outperformed IWN with an annualized return of 7.83%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.
IWM
11.87%
-3.62%
11.47%
12.48%
7.37%
7.83%
IWN
7.59%
-4.60%
10.63%
7.88%
7.06%
6.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWM vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWM vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWM vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than IWN's 1.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.14% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.88% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
IWM vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and IWN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWM vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.