IMCV vs. ILCV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCV returned 10.76%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for ILCV. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCV.

Performance

IMCV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 13.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 10.76%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.

IMCV

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 2.86%
• 6M: 13.16%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 1Y: 28.34%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: 10.76%
• ALL TIME*: 9.94%

ILCV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 3.16%
• 6M: 10.49%
• YTD: 13.67%
• 1Y: 30.69%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 11.86%
• ALL TIME*: 8.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	$2.01M	$2.25M	$2.59M
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	$2.47M	$2.33M	$2.03M

IMCV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	17.54%	13.52%	12.28%	11.89%	-6.98%	33.56%	-4.11%	24.72%	-10.93%	12.60%
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	13.67%	18.79%	17.03%	14.43%	-7.02%	26.71%	-0.84%	25.19%	-6.24%	15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and ILCV is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004	0.88

The correlation between IMCV and ILCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMCV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCV	ILCV
Financial Services	17.7%	18.3%
Industrials	11.6%	6.8%
Energy	11.4%	5.5%
Healthcare	10.3%	12.6%
Utilities	10.1%	3.4%
Technology	9.3%	22.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	9.6%
Real Estate	5.5%	1.9%
Basic Materials	4.8%	2.1%
Communication Services	2.4%	9.9%

Return for Risk

IMCV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 92
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

ILCV

ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 95
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMCV	ILCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	3.09	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	4.35	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.57	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	4.71	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.79	19.70	-3.91

IMCV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than ILCV's maximum drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and ILCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCV	ILCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.74%	-58.63%	-6.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.90%	-6.55%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-14.95%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	-18.58%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.33%	-35.53%	-10.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	0.00%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-9.26%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.56%	+0.24%

Volatility

IMCV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCV	ILCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	2.93%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	7.41%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	10.00%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	14.17%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.55%	16.64%	+2.91%

IMCV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMCV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than ILCV's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	1.54%	1.77%	1.99%	2.27%	2.32%	2.01%	2.96%	2.70%	2.93%	2.32%	2.76%	3.01%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.80%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCV and ILCV in my portfolio?

IMCV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCV or ILCV?

IMCV has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to ILCV (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

Which ETF is better, IMCV or ILCV?

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.86% vs 10.76% for IMCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCV or ILCV?

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCV or ILCV?

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCV or ILCV?

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.54% for ILCV.

What is the main difference between IMCV and ILCV?

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.04% for ILCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.