ILCV vs. MGV
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - ILCV tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index while MGV tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCV returned 11.80%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for MGV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ILCV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
ILCV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 11.80%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.
ILCV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
MGV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
ILCV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 7.60% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 25.19% | -6.24% | 15.00% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and MGV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ILCV and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
MGV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCV
MGV
Financial Services
ILCV
MGV
Healthcare
ILCV
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
MGV
Industrials
ILCV
MGV
Communication Services
ILCV
MGV
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
MGV
Energy
ILCV
MGV
Utilities
ILCV
MGV
Basic Materials
ILCV
MGV
Real Estate
ILCV
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
MGV
ILCV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCV | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.50 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 4.45 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 16.89 | -0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, roughly equal to the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -56.07% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.42% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -13.18% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -16.54% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | -35.41% | -0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.82% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -7.77% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.69% | -0.09% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.97%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.49% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 7.82% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 10.18% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 13.58% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 16.32% | +0.34% |
ILCV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than MGV's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and MGV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGV has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to ILCV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs MGV's -56.07%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.34% vs 11.80% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.62% for ILCV.
ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCV and 0.05% for MGV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer