IMCG vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
IMCG and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both IMCG and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMCG or SCHG.
Performance
IMCG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 23.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 32.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.26%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.
IMCG
23.11%
6.52%
15.64%
34.18%
13.88%
12.26%
SCHG
32.77%
2.85%
15.79%
38.25%
20.42%
16.44%
Key characteristics
| IMCG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 2.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.33 | 2.97 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.64 | 3.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.70 | 12.46 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.73% | 3.12% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.20% | 16.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.96% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.33% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IMCG and SCHG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMCG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMCG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 0.36% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
IMCG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMCG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is 4.59%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IMCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.