PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IMCG vs. IDHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IMCG vs. IDHQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while IDHQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCG returned 14.46%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for IDHQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMCG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.

Performance

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than IDHQ's 18.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed IDHQ with an annualized return of 14.46%, while IDHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.

IMCG

1D
-0.26%
1M
8.33%
YTD
20.05%
6M
18.28%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
14.46%

IDHQ

1D
-0.67%
1M
7.43%
YTD
18.47%
6M
20.13%
1Y
30.97%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF		20.05%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF		18.47%27.46%1.33%18.80%-20.23%11.38%16.09%29.58%-13.38%28.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and IDHQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2007

0.65

The correlation between IMCG and IDHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF

Often compared with IMCG:
IMCG vs. VOTIMCG vs. IWPIMCG vs. SCHMIMCG vs. MDYGIMCG vs. XMHQIMCG vs. IJKIMCG vs. IMCB
Often compared with IDHQ:
IDHQ vs. IDMOIDHQ vs. VIGIIDHQ vs. INTFIDHQ vs. BKIEIDHQ vs. SPYIDHQ vs. FNDFIDHQ vs. SCHF

Return for Risk

IMCG vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
IDHQ
IDHQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IDHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IDHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IMCGIDHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.51
1.68

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.18
2.47

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.31

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

9.23

-0.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the IDHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and IDHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IMCGIDHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.68

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.50

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.21

+0.33

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and IDHQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IMCGIDHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-73.84%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-13.44%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-14.07%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-33.54%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

-33.54%

-1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.96%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-21.20%

+11.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.37%

-0.76%

Volatility

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is 4.65%, while Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that IMCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IMCGIDHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

7.57%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

16.39%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

18.55%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

17.39%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

17.93%

+2.58%

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMCG vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than IDHQ's 2.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF		2.04%2.46%2.41%2.52%3.33%2.10%1.60%2.10%2.67%1.68%2.36%1.71%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF		0.65%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

IMCG and IDHQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDHQ has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to IMCG (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.46% vs 9.90% for IDHQ. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for IDHQ.

IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.65% for IMCG.

IMCG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IDHQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.29% for IDHQ.

IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and IDHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer