IDHQ vs. SCHF
IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDHQ returned 10.64%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IDHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDHQ achieves a 26.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 14.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDHQ having a 10.64% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 10.18%.
IDHQ
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 26.27%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
SCHF
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.89M | $6.19M | $5.51M | |
| $215.25M | $219.24M | $213.98M |
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 26.27% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | -20.23% | 11.38% | 16.09% | 29.58% | -13.38% | 28.16% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 14.79% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDHQ and SCHF is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IDHQ and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDHQ vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
IDHQ
SCHF
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDHQ | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.65 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 9.84 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDHQ drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDHQ and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDHQ | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.84% | -34.87% | -38.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -11.48% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -13.41% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.54% | -29.14% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.54% | -34.87% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -2.45% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.03% | -7.33% | -13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.08% | +0.27% |
Volatility
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) is 4.17%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that IDHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDHQ | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 5.38% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 15.48% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 17.39% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 16.70% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 17.05% | +0.92% |
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDHQ vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
IDHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than SCHF's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.01% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.07% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IDHQ and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to IDHQ (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDHQ dropped -73.84% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, IDHQ leads with 10.64% vs 10.18% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IDHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for IDHQ.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.01% for IDHQ.
IDHQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for IDHQ and 0.06% for SCHF.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDHQ and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer