IJT vs. IJH
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJT is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJT returned 10.78%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for IJH. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
IJT vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 14.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJT having a 10.78% annualized return and IJH not far ahead at 11.23%.
IJT
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
IJH
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
IJT vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 16.88% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.60% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and IJH is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IJT and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJT vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
IJH
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
IJT
IJH
Industrials
IJT
IJH
Healthcare
IJT
IJH
Financial Services
IJT
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
IJH
Real Estate
IJT
IJH
Energy
IJT
IJH
Basic Materials
IJT
IJH
Consumer Defensive
IJT
IJH
Communication Services
IJT
IJH
Utilities
IJT
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
IJH
IJT vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.98 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 10.93 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.70 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.42 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -55.07% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -8.83% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -24.10% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -24.10% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | -42.18% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -7.57% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.41% | +0.20% |
Volatility
IJT vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.24%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 4.24% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 11.31% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 15.50% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 19.74% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 21.17% | +1.85% |
IJT vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJT vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IJT and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJT has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to IJH (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.23% vs 10.78% for IJT. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.76% for IJT.
IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer