PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. ESML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. ESML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly lower than ESML's 16.26% return.


IJT

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.74%

ESML

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.86%
YTD
16.26%
6M
15.99%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
15.36%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-8.20%
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
16.26%10.62%12.01%17.27%-17.28%19.28%19.56%29.12%-10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and ESML is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.96

The correlation between IJT and ESML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJT vs. ESML - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
ESML

Technology

20.1%
17.5%

Industrials

20.0%
19.3%

Healthcare

14.5%
12.6%

Financial Services

13.6%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
11.3%

Real Estate

6.3%
6.5%

Energy

4.9%
5.9%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.2%

Utilities

1.9%
2.7%

Technology

IJT
20.1%
ESML
17.5%

Industrials

IJT
20.0%
ESML
19.3%

Healthcare

IJT
14.5%
ESML
12.6%

Financial Services

IJT
13.6%
ESML
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
9.8%
ESML
11.3%

Real Estate

IJT
6.3%
ESML
6.5%

Energy

IJT
4.9%
ESML
5.9%

Basic Materials

IJT
2.8%
ESML
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
2.8%
ESML
3.7%

Communication Services

IJT
2.7%
ESML
2.2%

Utilities

IJT
1.9%
ESML
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ESML
ESML Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ESML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESML Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESML Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ESML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESML Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJTESMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.07

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.95

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.80

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

14.00

-3.94

IJT vs. ESML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the ESML Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and ESML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJTESMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.07

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.34

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Drawdowns

IJT vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than ESML's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and ESML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTESMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-41.97%

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-9.04%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-26.68%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-28.61%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.47%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-8.97%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.45%

+0.16%

Volatility

IJT vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) at 4.25%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTESMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.25%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

11.67%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

16.66%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

21.23%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

23.40%

-0.38%

IJT vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than ESML's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
0.95%1.08%1.22%1.31%1.46%0.94%0.99%1.10%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.77%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IJT and ESML move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJT has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to ESML (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs ESML's -41.97%.

On 5-year performance, ESML leads with 7.18% vs 5.43% for IJT. On fees, ESML is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, ESML has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESML has performed better with a 7.18% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESML is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

ESML has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.

IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.17% for ESML.

ESML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and ESML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer