IJT vs. ESML
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - IJT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index while ESML tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJT returned 5.43%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for ESML. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ESML.
Performance
IJT vs. ESML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly lower than ESML's 16.26% return.
IJT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
ESML
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IJT vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 15.36% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -8.20% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 16.26% | 10.62% | 12.01% | 17.27% | -17.28% | 19.28% | 19.56% | 29.12% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and ESML is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IJT and ESML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJT vs. ESML - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
ESML
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
IJT
ESML
Industrials
IJT
ESML
Healthcare
IJT
ESML
Financial Services
IJT
ESML
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
ESML
Real Estate
IJT
ESML
Energy
IJT
ESML
Basic Materials
IJT
ESML
Consumer Defensive
IJT
ESML
Communication Services
IJT
ESML
Utilities
IJT
ESML
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
ESML
IJT vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 2.07 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 2.95 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.80 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 14.00 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.07 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.34 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than ESML's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and ESML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -41.97% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -9.04% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -26.68% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -28.61% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.47% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -8.97% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.45% | +0.16% |
Volatility
IJT vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) at 4.25%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.25% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 11.67% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 16.66% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 21.23% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 23.40% | -0.38% |
IJT vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJT vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than ESML's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 0.95% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.77% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IJT and ESML move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJT has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to ESML (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs ESML's -41.97%.
On 5-year performance, ESML leads with 7.18% vs 5.43% for IJT. On fees, ESML is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, ESML has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESML has performed better with a 7.18% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESML is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.
ESML has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.
IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.17% for ESML.
ESML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and ESML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer