ESML vs. XJR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR).
ESML and XJR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESML is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2018. XJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. Both ESML and XJR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESML or XJR.
Performance
ESML vs. XJR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESML achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than XJR's 15.78% return.
ESML
17.95%
6.19%
15.26%
32.19%
11.36%
N/A
XJR
15.78%
6.53%
15.73%
31.21%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
| ESML | XJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.79 | 1.51 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.54 | 2.26 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.79 | 1.70 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.90 | 8.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.33% | 3.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.39% | 20.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.97% | -26.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.72% | -2.58% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESML vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XJR's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between ESML and XJR is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESML vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ESML vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison
ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than XJR's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ESML vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -26.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and XJR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ESML vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) is 6.22%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that ESML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.