PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESML vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESML vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESML achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


ESML

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.86%
YTD
16.26%
6M
15.99%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESML vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
16.26%10.62%12.01%17.27%-17.28%19.28%19.56%29.12%-10.89%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ESML and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.82

The correlation between ESML and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESML vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESML
VOO

Industrials

19.3%
8.3%

Technology

17.5%
35.7%

Financial Services

14.4%
11.6%

Healthcare

12.6%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
10.2%

Real Estate

6.5%
1.9%

Energy

5.9%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.9%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
11.3%

Industrials

ESML
19.3%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

ESML
17.5%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

ESML
14.4%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

ESML
12.6%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ESML
11.3%
VOO
10.2%

Real Estate

ESML
6.5%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

ESML
5.9%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

ESML
3.9%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

ESML
3.7%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

ESML
2.7%
VOO
2.4%

Communication Services

ESML
2.2%
VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESML vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESML
ESML Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ESML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESML Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESML Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ESML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESML Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESML vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMLVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

2.39

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.25

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.16

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.00

14.73

-0.73

ESML vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESML Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESML and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMLVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.39

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.83

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.89

-0.43

Drawdowns

ESML vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-33.99%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-8.90%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-18.69%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-24.52%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.70%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-3.69%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.91%

+0.54%

Volatility

ESML vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that ESML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.84%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

8.90%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

11.80%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

16.81%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

18.01%

+5.39%

ESML vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESML vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
0.95%1.08%1.22%1.31%1.46%0.94%0.99%1.10%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESML and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESML has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESML dropped -41.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 7.18% for ESML. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ESML.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.95% for ESML.

ESML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ESML and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESML and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer