ESML vs. FNDA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).
ESML and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESML is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2018. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both ESML and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESML or FNDA.
Correlation
The correlation between ESML and FNDA is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ESML vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ESML:
-0.30
FNDA:
-0.30
ESML:
-0.29
FNDA:
-0.29
ESML:
0.96
FNDA:
0.96
ESML:
-0.26
FNDA:
-0.26
ESML:
-1.00
FNDA:
-0.96
ESML:
6.97%
FNDA:
6.96%
ESML:
22.88%
FNDA:
22.15%
ESML:
-41.97%
FNDA:
-44.64%
ESML:
-22.25%
FNDA:
-21.88%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESML having a -15.40% return and FNDA slightly higher at -15.17%.
ESML
-15.40%
-7.70%
-15.18%
-7.29%
11.77%
N/A
FNDA
-15.17%
-7.57%
-14.84%
-7.26%
14.30%
6.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESML vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESML vs. FNDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ESML
FNDA
ESML vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ESML vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than FNDA's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.70% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
ESML vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ESML vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) has a higher volatility of 14.90% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) at 14.13%. This indicates that ESML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.