IJS vs. VTWV
IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - IJS tracks the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index while VTWV tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJS returned 10.07%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for VTWV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWV.
Performance
IJS vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 17.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJS having a 10.07% annualized return and VTWV not far ahead at 10.32%.
IJS
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 15.13%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
VTWV
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 41.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
IJS vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 15.13% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 17.44% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJS and VTWV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IJS and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJS vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJS
VTWV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJS
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
IJS
VTWV
Industrials
IJS
VTWV
Technology
IJS
VTWV
Real Estate
IJS
VTWV
Energy
IJS
VTWV
Healthcare
IJS
VTWV
Basic Materials
IJS
VTWV
Communication Services
IJS
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
IJS
VTWV
Utilities
IJS
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJS vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
IJS
VTWV
IJS vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJS | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 2.30 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 3.24 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 4.83 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 16.46 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJS | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.30 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
IJS vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than VTWV's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJS | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -45.73% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -8.64% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -26.72% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -26.72% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.68% | -45.73% | -1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -1.43% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -7.81% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.53% | +0.30% |
Volatility
IJS vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.42%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJS | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.06% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 12.15% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 18.17% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 21.72% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 23.54% | +0.06% |
IJS vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJS vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than VTWV's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IJS and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to IJS (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.32% vs 10.07% for IJS. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.29% for IJS.
IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.10% for VTWV.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJS and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer