PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 17.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJS having a 10.07% annualized return and VTWV not far ahead at 10.32%.


IJS

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.29%
YTD
15.13%
6M
14.62%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
10.07%

VTWV

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.86%
YTD
17.44%
6M
16.55%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
15.13%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
17.44%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and VTWV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between IJS and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJS
VTWV

Financial Services

19.8%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
9.2%

Industrials

11.6%
11.9%

Technology

11.3%
10.0%

Real Estate

8.7%
10.4%

Energy

7.6%
8.9%

Healthcare

7.6%
10.2%

Basic Materials

7.1%
5.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
2.2%

Utilities

2.2%
5.2%

Financial Services

IJS
19.8%
VTWV
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.9%
VTWV
9.2%

Industrials

IJS
11.6%
VTWV
11.9%

Technology

IJS
11.3%
VTWV
10.0%

Real Estate

IJS
8.7%
VTWV
10.4%

Energy

IJS
7.6%
VTWV
8.9%

Healthcare

IJS
7.6%
VTWV
10.2%

Basic Materials

IJS
7.1%
VTWV
5.4%

Communication Services

IJS
4.4%
VTWV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

IJS
3.8%
VTWV
2.2%

Utilities

IJS
2.2%
VTWV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJSVTWVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.30

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.24

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

4.83

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.05

16.46

-3.41

IJS vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJSVTWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.30

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.31

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.49

-0.08

Drawdowns

IJS vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than VTWV's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-45.73%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.64%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-26.72%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-26.72%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-45.73%

-1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.43%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-7.81%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.53%

+0.30%

Volatility

IJS vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.42%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

5.06%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

12.15%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

18.17%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

21.72%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

23.54%

+0.06%

IJS vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJS vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than VTWV's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.29%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.58%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IJS and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to IJS (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.32% vs 10.07% for IJS. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.29% for IJS.

IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer