PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJS vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJS vs. IJR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJS returned 10.48%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for IJR. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.

Performance

IJS vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 19.34% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 10.48%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.

IJS

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.94%
YTD
17.37%
6M
16.01%
1Y
37.29%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
10.48%

IJR

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.22%
YTD
19.34%
6M
16.86%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF		17.37%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF		19.34%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and IJR is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.97

The correlation between IJS and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IJS
IJR

Financial Services

19.4%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
12.5%

Technology

13.4%
15.9%

Industrials

11.6%
16.0%

Real Estate

8.6%
7.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
11.0%

Energy

7.0%
6.8%

Basic Materials

6.9%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.2%

Utilities

2.1%
1.9%

Financial Services

IJS
19.4%
IJR
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.4%
IJR
12.5%

Technology

IJS
13.4%
IJR
15.9%

Industrials

IJS
11.6%
IJR
16.0%

Real Estate

IJS
8.6%
IJR
7.5%

Healthcare

IJS
7.3%
IJR
11.0%

Energy

IJS
7.0%
IJR
6.8%

Basic Materials

IJS
6.9%
IJR
4.7%

Communication Services

IJS
4.4%
IJR
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

IJS
3.9%
IJR
3.2%

Utilities

IJS
2.1%
IJR
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF

Often compared with IJS:
IJS vs. AVUVIJS vs. VBRIJS vs. VIOVIJS vs. IWNIJS vs. VOOIJS vs. ISCVIJS vs. IWM
Often compared with IJR:
IJR vs. IWMIJR vs. VBIJR vs. AVUVIJR vs. IJHIJR vs. SCHAIJR vs. VBRIJR vs. VIOO

Return for Risk

IJS vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IJSIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.05
1.96

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.93
2.84

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

3.99

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

13.39

-0.11

IJS vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IJR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJSIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-58.15%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.68%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-28.02%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-28.02%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-44.36%

-3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.43%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-9.26%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.58%

+0.24%

Volatility

IJS vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJSIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.96%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

12.06%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

17.73%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

21.40%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.59%

22.90%

+0.69%

IJS vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJS vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than IJR's 1.15% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF		1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF		1.36%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.98, IJS and IJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJR has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to IJS (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 11.30% vs 10.48% for IJS. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.

IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.06% for IJR.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer