PortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and IWM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IJS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
703.29%
468.11%
IJS
IWM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IJS:

-0.15

IWM:

-0.01

Sortino Ratio

IJS:

-0.04

IWM:

0.14

Omega Ratio

IJS:

1.00

IWM:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

IJS:

-0.12

IWM:

-0.02

Martin Ratio

IJS:

-0.36

IWM:

-0.05

Ulcer Index

IJS:

9.72%

IWM:

9.33%

Daily Std Dev

IJS:

24.06%

IWM:

24.06%

Max Drawdown

IJS:

-60.11%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

IJS:

-19.24%

IWM:

-16.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a -12.63% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's -8.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJS having a 6.51% annualized return and IWM not far behind at 6.48%.


IJS

YTD

-12.63%

1M

13.18%

6M

-16.91%

1Y

-3.50%

5Y*

12.75%

10Y*

6.51%

IWM

YTD

-8.75%

1M

15.08%

6M

-14.45%

1Y

-0.14%

5Y*

10.14%

10Y*

6.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IJS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IJS vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IJS is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IJS is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IJS is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IJS is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IJS is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IJS is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IJS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.15
-0.01
IJS
IWM

Dividends

IJS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than IWM's 1.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
2.04%1.78%1.42%1.47%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%1.41%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.23%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

IJS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-19.24%
-16.57%
IJS
IWM

Volatility

IJS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 11.14% and 10.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.14%
10.70%
IJS
IWM