PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. IWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 21.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJS having a 10.51% annualized return and IWN not far ahead at 10.74%.


IJS

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.17%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.52%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
10.51%

IWN

1D
0.52%
1M
3.53%
YTD
21.06%
6M
18.12%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
17.64%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
21.06%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and IWN is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.97

The correlation between IJS and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJS
IWN

Financial Services

19.4%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
8.9%

Technology

13.4%
11.6%

Industrials

11.6%
12.1%

Real Estate

8.6%
10.2%

Healthcare

7.3%
10.1%

Energy

7.0%
7.9%

Basic Materials

6.9%
5.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
2.1%

Utilities

2.1%
5.1%

Financial Services

IJS
19.4%
IWN
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.4%
IWN
8.9%

Technology

IJS
13.4%
IWN
11.6%

Industrials

IJS
11.6%
IWN
12.1%

Real Estate

IJS
8.6%
IWN
10.2%

Healthcare

IJS
7.3%
IWN
10.1%

Energy

IJS
7.0%
IWN
7.9%

Basic Materials

IJS
6.9%
IWN
5.4%

Communication Services

IJS
4.4%
IWN
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

IJS
3.9%
IWN
2.1%

Utilities

IJS
2.1%
IWN
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSIWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

5.31

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

17.88

-3.84

IJS vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSIWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-61.55%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.45%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-26.70%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-26.70%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-46.08%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

0.00%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-10.14%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.51%

+0.30%

Volatility

IJS vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.84%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSIWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

5.29%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

12.29%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

18.08%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

21.41%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

23.42%

+0.20%

IJS vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJS vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than IWN's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.35%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.46%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IJS and IWN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWN has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to IJS (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs IWN's -61.55%.

On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.74% vs 10.51% for IJS. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.35% for IJS.

IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.24% for IWN.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and IWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer