IJS vs. IWN
IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds from iShares - IJS tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index while IWN tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJS returned 10.51%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for IWN. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.
Performance
IJS vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 21.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJS having a 10.51% annualized return and IWN not far ahead at 10.74%.
IJS
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 39.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
IWN
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 21.06%
- 6M
- 18.12%
- 1Y
- 44.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
IJS vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 17.64% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 21.06% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJS and IWN is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IJS and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJS vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJS
IWN
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJS
IWN
Consumer Cyclical
IJS
IWN
Technology
IJS
IWN
Industrials
IJS
IWN
Real Estate
IJS
IWN
Healthcare
IJS
IWN
Energy
IJS
IWN
Basic Materials
IJS
IWN
Communication Services
IJS
IWN
Consumer Defensive
IJS
IWN
Utilities
IJS
IWN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJS vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank
IJS
IWN
IJS vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJS | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 5.31 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 17.88 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJS vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IWN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJS | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -61.55% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -8.45% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -26.70% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -26.70% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.68% | -46.08% | -1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | 0.00% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -10.14% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.51% | +0.30% |
Volatility
IJS vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.84%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJS | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 5.29% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 12.29% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 18.08% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 21.41% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 23.42% | +0.20% |
IJS vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJS vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than IWN's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IJS and IWN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWN has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to IJS (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs IWN's -61.55%.
On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.74% vs 10.51% for IJS. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.
IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.35% for IJS.
IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.24% for IWN.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJS and IWN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer