IJH vs. JHMM
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.27%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for JHMM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.
Performance
IJH vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than JHMM's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed JHMM with an annualized return of 11.27%, while JHMM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.
IJH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
JHMM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
IJH vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.10% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.60% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and JHMM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IJH and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJH vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJH
JHMM
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJH
JHMM
Technology
IJH
JHMM
Financial Services
IJH
JHMM
Consumer Cyclical
IJH
JHMM
Healthcare
IJH
JHMM
Real Estate
IJH
JHMM
Energy
IJH
JHMM
Basic Materials
IJH
JHMM
Consumer Defensive
IJH
JHMM
Utilities
IJH
JHMM
Communication Services
IJH
JHMM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJH vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
IJH
JHMM
IJH vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJH | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.89 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 11.17 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJH | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than JHMM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and JHMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJH | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.07% | -40.71% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -8.64% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -21.88% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -24.10% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.18% | -40.71% | -1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.24% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -5.43% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.23% | +0.18% |
Volatility
IJH vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJH | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.81% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 10.47% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 14.12% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 18.32% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 19.60% | +1.58% |
IJH vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJH vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IJH and JHMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJH has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs JHMM's -40.71%.
On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.88% vs 11.27% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.88% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.42% for JHMM.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJH and JHMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer