PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJH vs. JHMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJH vs. JHMM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 10.97%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for JHMM. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.

Performance

IJH vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 15.88% return, which is significantly higher than JHMM's 14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed JHMM with an annualized return of 10.97%, while JHMM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.

IJH

1D
1.12%
1M
0.03%
6M
10.44%
YTD
15.88%
1Y
24.18%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
9.89%

JHMM

1D
1.20%
1M
0.75%
6M
9.00%
YTD
14.90%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

IJH

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
$455.75M$451.31M$537.83M

JHMM

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
$16.71M$15.09M$16.89M

IJH vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF		15.88%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF		14.90%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and JHMM is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015

0.97

The correlation between IJH and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJH vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IJH
JHMM

Industrials

25.2%
16.4%

Technology

17.5%
18.1%

Financial Services

13.9%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.5%

Real Estate

7.2%
8.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
7.4%

Energy

4.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
6.1%

Utilities

2.8%
3.7%

Communication Services

1.5%
1.0%

Industrials

IJH
25.2%
JHMM
16.4%

Technology

IJH
17.5%
JHMM
18.1%

Financial Services

IJH
13.9%
JHMM
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.5%
JHMM
8.3%

Healthcare

IJH
8.9%
JHMM
8.5%

Real Estate

IJH
7.2%
JHMM
8.1%

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
JHMM
7.4%

Energy

IJH
4.6%
JHMM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.2%
JHMM
6.1%

Utilities

IJH
2.8%
JHMM
3.7%

Communication Services

IJH
1.5%
JHMM
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF

Often compared with IJH:
IJH vs. VOIJH vs. IJRIJH vs. MDYIJH vs. SCHMIJH vs. IJKIJH vs. IJJIJH vs. IVOO
Often compared with JHMM:
JHMM vs. XMHQJHMM vs. OTCAXJHMM vs. VOEJHMM vs. JPMEJHMM vs. IMCGJHMM vs. VOOJHMM vs. BND

Return for Risk

IJH vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJH vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IJHJHMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.55
1.64

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.28
2.37

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.71

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

10.42

-0.41

IJH vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJH vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than JHMM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and JHMM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJHJHMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-40.71%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-8.64%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-21.88%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-24.10%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-40.71%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.01%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-5.37%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.24%

+0.18%

Volatility

IJH vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.16%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJHJHMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.16%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

10.64%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.70%

14.32%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

18.31%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.14%

19.55%

+1.59%

IJH vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

IJH vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than JHMM's 0.88% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF		1.17%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF		0.88%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.97, IJH and JHMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJH has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to JHMM (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.70% vs 10.97% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.88% for JHMM.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.42% for JHMM.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and JHMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer