JHMM vs. BND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHMM returned 11.91%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for BND. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

JHMM vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 11.91%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.

JHMM

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

BND

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 5.19%
• 3Y*: 4.03%
• 5Y*: 0.20%
• 10Y*: 1.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	12.87%	10.73%	14.61%	14.53%	-15.30%	24.54%	16.22%	30.01%	-9.57%	19.96%
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	0.46%	7.08%	1.38%	5.65%	-13.11%	-1.86%	7.71%	8.84%	-0.12%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and BND is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015	0.03

Over the past year, JHMM and BND have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

JHMM vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 57
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BND

BND Risk / Return Rank: 38
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHMM	BND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.38	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.07	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	1.85	+1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	5.66	+6.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHMM vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHMM	BND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	1.38	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.03	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.29	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.59	+0.04

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and BND.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMM	BND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-18.58%	-22.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-2.68%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-5.92%	-15.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.10%	-17.91%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.71%	-18.58%	-22.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.18%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-3.06%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	0.88%	+1.35%

Volatility

JHMM vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.26%. This indicates that JHMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMM	BND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	1.26%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.49%	2.68%	+7.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.11%	3.78%	+10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	6.02%	+12.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.60%	5.53%	+14.07%

JHMM vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMM vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	3.96%	3.86%	3.67%	3.09%	2.60%	2.12%	2.38%	2.72%	2.81%	2.54%	2.51%	2.57%
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.87%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMM and BND in my portfolio?

JHMM and BND have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHMM or BND?

JHMM has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to BND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs BND's -18.58%.

Which ETF is better, JHMM or BND?

On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.91% vs 1.60% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHMM or BND?

Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 1.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMM or BND?

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMM or BND?

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.

What is the main difference between JHMM and BND?

JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.03% for BND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.