JHMM vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
JHMM and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both JHMM and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JHMM vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHMM vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 3.12% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.09% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 11.17%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
JHMM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 18.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
BND
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHMM vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
BND
JHMM vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.93 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.75 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 4.78 | +1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.93 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.04 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.30 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and BND is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JHMM vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BND's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.93% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -18.58% | -22.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -2.44% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -17.91% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | -18.58% | -22.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | -2.54% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -3.07% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 0.90% | +2.16% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that JHMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 1.63% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 2.52% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 4.30% | +15.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 6.00% | +12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 5.52% | +14.05% |