IGV vs. FEZ
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.60%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for FEZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
IGV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -12.01% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 15.60%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- 6M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- -12.01%
- 1Y
- -16.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.30%
FEZ
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.67%
IGV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -12.01% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.18% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and FEZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and FEZ has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
FEZ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
FEZ
Communication Services
IGV
FEZ
Financial Services
IGV
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
FEZ
Industrials
IGV
FEZ
Basic Materials
IGV
-
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
FEZ
Energy
IGV
-
FEZ
Healthcare
IGV
-
FEZ
Real Estate
IGV
-
FEZ
-
Utilities
IGV
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
FEZ
IGV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.16 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 1.21 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 4.15 | -5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -64.21% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -13.63% | -22.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -15.85% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -35.05% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -39.69% | -6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.05% | -3.38% | -17.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.48% | -16.99% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.89% | 3.97% | +14.92% |
Volatility
IGV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 4.58%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 4.58% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 15.84% | +9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.69% | 18.46% | +10.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.08% | 20.66% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 20.68% | +5.73% |
IGV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FEZ's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.65% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and FEZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to FEZ (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.60% vs 10.83% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer