IGV vs. FEZ
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 16.44%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for FEZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
IGV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 16.44%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -12.57%
- 1Y
- -9.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
IGV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -9.50% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 4.68% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and FEZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2002 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and FEZ has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
FEZ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
FEZ
Communication Services
IGV
FEZ
Financial Services
IGV
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
FEZ
Industrials
IGV
FEZ
Basic Materials
IGV
-
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
FEZ
Energy
IGV
-
FEZ
Healthcare
IGV
-
FEZ
Real Estate
IGV
-
FEZ
-
Utilities
IGV
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
FEZ
IGV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.16 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.12 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 3.81 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 0.84 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.48 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.30 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -64.21% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -13.63% | -22.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -15.85% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -35.05% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -39.69% | -6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.80% | -2.79% | -16.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -17.07% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 4.00% | +13.33% |
Volatility
IGV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 5.64%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 5.64% | +6.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.65% | 15.06% | +9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.93% | 18.11% | +9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 20.64% | +7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 21.12% | +5.26% |
IGV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and FEZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to FEZ (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.44% vs 10.66% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer