PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. IEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. IEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares Europe ETF (IEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEZ having a 10.27% return and IEV slightly lower at 10.21%. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed IEV with an annualized return of 11.23%, while IEV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
0.10%
1M
1.13%
6M
6.29%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
25.36%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
7.84%

IEV

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.94%
6M
5.40%
YTD
10.21%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.83M$51.15M$96.31M
$9.58M$7.30M$8.64M

FEZ vs. IEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
10.27%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
10.21%35.63%1.36%20.14%-14.24%16.73%4.07%24.03%-14.68%24.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and IEV is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002

0.95

The correlation between FEZ and IEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEZ vs. IEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
IEV

Financial Services

26.2%
25.5%

Industrials

22.1%
18.1%

Technology

16.6%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
8.2%

Healthcare

5.3%
12.8%

Utilities

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

4.5%
5.1%

Basic Materials

3.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Financial Services

FEZ
26.2%
IEV
25.5%

Industrials

FEZ
22.1%
IEV
18.1%

Technology

FEZ
16.6%
IEV
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
9.5%
IEV
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.6%
IEV
8.2%

Healthcare

FEZ
5.3%
IEV
12.8%

Utilities

FEZ
4.9%
IEV
4.7%

Energy

FEZ
4.5%
IEV
5.1%

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.5%
IEV
5.5%

Communication Services

FEZ
1.9%
IEV
3.2%

Real Estate

FEZ

-

IEV
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. IEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IEV
IEV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEZ vs. IEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares Europe ETF (IEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZIEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.95

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

7.28

-1.17

FEZ vs. IEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the IEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and IEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. IEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum IEV drawdown of -63.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and IEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZIEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-63.27%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-12.31%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-14.63%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-30.60%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-36.62%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-14.96%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.29%

+0.61%

Volatility

FEZ vs. IEV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares Europe ETF (IEV) at 4.37%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZIEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.37%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

13.80%

+2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

16.02%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

17.65%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

18.21%

+2.49%

FEZ vs. IEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IEV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. IEV - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than IEV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.55%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
2.74%2.73%3.10%2.77%3.06%2.81%1.76%3.06%3.43%2.39%3.08%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FEZ and IEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEZ has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to IEV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs IEV's -63.27%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.23% vs 9.81% for IEV. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IEV.

IEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.55% for FEZ.

FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.60% for IEV.

IEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and IEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer