PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly lower than EZU's 10.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEZ having a 11.73% annualized return and EZU not far behind at 11.31%.


FEZ

1D
-0.59%
1M
3.65%
YTD
8.33%
6M
8.58%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
11.73%

EZU

1D
0.06%
1M
3.80%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.35%
1Y
24.75%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
8.33%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
10.13%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%7.62%23.27%-16.76%27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and EZU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002

0.97

The correlation between FEZ and EZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEZ vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
EZU

Financial Services

23.8%
23.8%

Technology

19.6%
17.0%

Industrials

19.3%
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
5.6%

Healthcare

5.6%
5.7%

Energy

5.3%
3.8%

Utilities

5.0%
6.3%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
5.0%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Financial Services

FEZ
23.8%
EZU
23.8%

Technology

FEZ
19.6%
EZU
17.0%

Industrials

FEZ
19.3%
EZU
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
9.3%
EZU
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.9%
EZU
5.6%

Healthcare

FEZ
5.6%
EZU
5.7%

Energy

FEZ
5.3%
EZU
3.8%

Utilities

FEZ
5.0%
EZU
6.3%

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.8%
EZU
3.9%

Communication Services

FEZ
2.6%
EZU
5.0%

Real Estate

FEZ

-

EZU
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.90

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

6.90

-1.24

FEZ vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-65.32%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-13.06%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-15.02%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-36.11%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-41.37%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-19.20%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.59%

+0.40%

Volatility

FEZ vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

5.56%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

14.83%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

17.43%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

19.94%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

20.46%

+0.61%

FEZ vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than EZU's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.65%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
4.16%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FEZ and EZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZU has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to FEZ (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs EZU's -65.32%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.73% vs 11.31% for EZU. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.65% for EZU.

FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.51% for EZU.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer