FEZ vs. EWN
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN).
FEZ and EWN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEZ is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX 50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2002. EWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both FEZ and EWN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEZ or EWN.
Performance
FEZ vs. EWN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than EWN's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 4.99%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.
FEZ
2.32%
-6.25%
-7.35%
8.18%
6.77%
4.99%
EWN
1.09%
-6.98%
-11.57%
8.61%
8.16%
8.17%
Key characteristics
| FEZ | EWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 0.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.16 | 1.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.84% | 5.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.76% | 18.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -64.21% | -65.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.32% | -15.25% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEZ vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and EWN is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEZ vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEZ vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than EWN's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.89% | 2.75% | 3.05% | 2.61% | 2.12% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% | 3.78% | 2.72% |
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | 2.03% | 1.79% | 1.98% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 2.58% | 2.40% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 1.92% | 2.30% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and EWN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEZ vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) at 4.40%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.