PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGRO vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGRO vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGRO achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 15.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IGRO has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 9.08%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.


IGRO

1D
0.23%
1M
0.89%
YTD
7.79%
6M
9.17%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.08%

MGV

1D
0.90%
1M
4.18%
YTD
15.50%
6M
15.37%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
13.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGRO vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
7.79%25.03%7.78%15.38%-12.72%9.94%7.71%26.13%-14.86%24.64%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
15.50%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IGRO and MGV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.63

The correlation between IGRO and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGRO vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGRO
MGV

Financial Services

32.0%
23.9%

Industrials

14.4%
13.7%

Healthcare

12.6%
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
11.9%

Technology

8.7%
14.2%

Utilities

6.9%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.4%

Energy

2.4%
6.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.2%

Financial Services

IGRO
32.0%
MGV
23.9%

Industrials

IGRO
14.4%
MGV
13.7%

Healthcare

IGRO
12.6%
MGV
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

IGRO
10.1%
MGV
11.9%

Technology

IGRO
8.7%
MGV
14.2%

Utilities

IGRO
6.9%
MGV
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IGRO
6.8%
MGV
3.7%

Basic Materials

IGRO
3.5%
MGV
2.4%

Energy

IGRO
2.4%
MGV
6.6%

Communication Services

IGRO
1.9%
MGV
3.4%

Real Estate

IGRO
0.6%
MGV
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGRO vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGRO
IGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGRO vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGROMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.50

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

4.36

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

16.56

-11.39

IGRO vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGRO and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGRO vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGRO and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGROMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-56.07%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-6.42%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.13%

-13.18%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-16.54%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.25%

-35.41%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-7.78%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.69%

+1.01%

Volatility

IGRO vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.33%. This indicates that IGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGROMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.33%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

7.77%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

10.13%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

13.61%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

16.35%

+0.50%

IGRO vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGRO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGRO vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

IGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than MGV's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
2.36%2.51%2.44%2.79%2.69%2.27%2.41%2.65%2.97%2.43%1.18%0.00%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.85%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGRO and MGV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGRO has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to MGV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGRO dropped -36.25% vs MGV's -56.07%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.15% vs 9.08% for IGRO. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IGRO.

IGRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.85% for MGV.

IGRO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. IGRO tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Dividend Growth Index (Net), while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IGRO and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGRO and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer