IGRO vs. MFDX
IGRO (iShares International Dividend Growth ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IGRO tracks the Morningstar Global ex-US Dividend Growth Index (Net) while MFDX tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGRO returned 7.30%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for MFDX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGRO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.
Performance
IGRO vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGRO achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 9.73% return.
IGRO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 5.91%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 13.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
IGRO vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGRO iShares International Dividend Growth ETF | 5.91% | 25.03% | 7.78% | 15.38% | -12.72% | 9.94% | 7.71% | 26.13% | -14.86% | 6.46% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGRO and MFDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IGRO and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGRO vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGRO
MFDX
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IGRO
MFDX
Industrials
IGRO
MFDX
Healthcare
IGRO
MFDX
Consumer Defensive
IGRO
MFDX
Technology
IGRO
MFDX
Utilities
IGRO
MFDX
Consumer Cyclical
IGRO
MFDX
Basic Materials
IGRO
MFDX
Energy
IGRO
MFDX
Communication Services
IGRO
MFDX
Real Estate
IGRO
MFDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGRO vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank
IGRO
MFDX
IGRO vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGRO | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.18 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 8.66 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGRO | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.70 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.54 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IGRO vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGRO and MFDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGRO | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.25% | -36.05% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -10.66% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.13% | -11.62% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -25.58% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -1.84% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -6.50% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.68% | -0.01% |
Volatility
IGRO vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) is 3.60%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that IGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGRO | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 4.45% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | 11.34% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 13.73% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 15.03% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 16.41% | +0.45% |
IGRO vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGRO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGRO vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison
IGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than MFDX's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGRO iShares International Dividend Growth ETF | 2.41% | 2.51% | 2.44% | 2.79% | 2.69% | 2.27% | 2.41% | 2.65% | 2.97% | 2.43% | 1.18% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IGRO and MFDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to IGRO (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGRO dropped -36.25% vs MFDX's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs 7.30% for IGRO. On fees, IGRO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGRO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.41% for IGRO.
IGRO tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Dividend Growth Index (Net), while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IGRO and 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGRO and MFDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer