PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGRO vs. MFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGRO vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGRO achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 9.73% return.


IGRO

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.87%
YTD
5.91%
6M
8.22%
1Y
13.91%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.49%

MFDX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.31%
YTD
9.73%
6M
12.33%
1Y
23.13%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGRO vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
5.91%25.03%7.78%15.38%-12.72%9.94%7.71%26.13%-14.86%6.46%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
9.73%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%11.07%6.90%19.88%-14.88%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IGRO and MFDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.87

The correlation between IGRO and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGRO vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGRO
MFDX

Financial Services

32.0%
16.4%

Industrials

14.8%
19.9%

Healthcare

12.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
8.0%

Technology

7.8%
7.1%

Utilities

7.3%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
8.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
10.8%

Energy

2.6%
6.8%

Communication Services

1.9%
7.0%

Real Estate

0.6%
3.0%

Financial Services

IGRO
32.0%
MFDX
16.4%

Industrials

IGRO
14.8%
MFDX
19.9%

Healthcare

IGRO
12.6%
MFDX
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

IGRO
10.1%
MFDX
8.0%

Technology

IGRO
7.8%
MFDX
7.1%

Utilities

IGRO
7.3%
MFDX
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IGRO
6.7%
MFDX
8.6%

Basic Materials

IGRO
3.6%
MFDX
10.8%

Energy

IGRO
2.6%
MFDX
6.8%

Communication Services

IGRO
1.9%
MFDX
7.0%

Real Estate

IGRO
0.6%
MFDX
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGRO vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGRO
IGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGRO vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGROMFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.18

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

8.66

-3.44

IGRO vs. MFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGRO and MFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGROMFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.70

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.66

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.54

-0.01

Drawdowns

IGRO vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGRO and MFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGROMFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-36.05%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-10.66%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.13%

-11.62%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-25.58%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-1.84%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-6.50%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.68%

-0.01%

Volatility

IGRO vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) is 3.60%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that IGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGROMFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.45%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

11.34%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

13.73%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

15.03%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

16.41%

+0.45%

IGRO vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGRO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGRO vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

IGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than MFDX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
2.41%2.51%2.44%2.79%2.69%2.27%2.41%2.65%2.97%2.43%1.18%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.79%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IGRO and MFDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to IGRO (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGRO dropped -36.25% vs MFDX's -36.05%.

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs 7.30% for IGRO. On fees, IGRO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGRO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.41% for IGRO.

IGRO tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Dividend Growth Index (Net), while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IGRO and 0.39% for MFDX.

MFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGRO and MFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer