PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGRO vs. FDEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IGRO vs. FDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IGRO vs. FDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
1.57%25.03%7.78%15.38%-12.72%9.94%7.71%14.29%
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.77%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGRO achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than FDEM's 2.77% return.


IGRO

1D
2.91%
1M
-6.70%
YTD
1.57%
6M
6.16%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*

FDEM

1D
3.24%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
2.77%
6M
6.29%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IGRO vs. FDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGRO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IGRO vs. FDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGRO
IGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGRO vs. FDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGROFDEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.54

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

2.11

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.18

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.00

8.58

-1.58

IGRO vs. FDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the FDEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGRO and FDEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGROFDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.54

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.42

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.39

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between IGRO and FDEM is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IGRO vs. FDEM - Dividend Comparison

IGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than FDEM's 3.17% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
2.51%2.51%2.44%2.79%2.69%2.27%2.41%2.65%2.97%2.43%1.18%
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
3.17%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IGRO vs. FDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, which is greater than FDEM's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGRO and FDEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IGROFDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-33.65%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-12.70%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-29.19%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.74%

-9.87%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-9.00%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.22%

-0.64%

Volatility

IGRO vs. FDEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) is 6.63%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that IGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IGROFDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

9.54%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

13.16%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

18.15%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

15.77%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

17.76%

-0.87%