IGF vs. IXUS

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while IXUS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.57%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for IXUS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IXUS.

Performance

IGF vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than IXUS's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed IXUS with an annualized return of 8.57%, while IXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.24% annualized return.

IGF

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

IXUS

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 15.55%
• 6M: 17.02%
• 1Y: 32.06%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	10.15%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF	15.55%	32.40%	5.19%	15.83%	-16.47%	8.86%	10.80%	21.71%	-14.41%	28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and IXUS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.76

The correlation between IGF and IXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGF vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGF	IXUS
Industrials	40.6%	13.9%
Utilities	39.7%	2.7%
Energy	19.6%	4.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	7.0%
Communication Services	-	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Financial Services	-	22.9%
Healthcare	-	6.4%
Technology	-	24.0%

Return for Risk

IGF vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 56
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 55

IXUS

IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGF	IXUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.98	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.70	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.84	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	10.91	-2.26

IGF vs. IXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the IXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and IXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGF vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and IXUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGF	IXUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.33%	-36.22%	-22.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-11.36%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-13.75%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-30.03%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.11%	-36.22%	-5.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.57%	-0.11%	-2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-7.49%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.95%	-0.92%

Volatility

IGF vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 3.86%, while iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGF	IXUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	7.02%	-3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.69%	14.29%	-5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	16.31%	-5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.01%	16.40%	-2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	17.13%	-0.30%

IGF vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGF vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than IXUS's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	4.37%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF	4.12%	3.24%	3.33%	3.13%	2.48%	3.12%	1.85%	3.09%	3.00%	2.41%	2.58%	2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGF and IXUS in my portfolio?

IGF and IXUS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGF or IXUS?

IXUS has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to IGF (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs IXUS's -36.22%.

Which ETF is better, IGF or IXUS?

On 10-year performance, IXUS leads with 10.24% vs 8.57% for IGF. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGF or IXUS?

Over the 10-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGF or IXUS?

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGF or IXUS?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 4.12% for IXUS.

What is the main difference between IGF and IXUS?

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IXUS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.07% for IXUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.