PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. ACWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IXUS having a 11.27% return and ACWX slightly higher at 11.32%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXUS having a 9.68% annualized return and ACWX not far behind at 9.51%.


IXUS

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
11.27%
6M
13.74%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
9.68%

ACWX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.85%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
11.27%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
11.32%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and ACWX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.99

The correlation between IXUS and ACWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXUS vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
ACWX

Financial Services

22.4%
23.3%

Technology

18.0%
22.4%

Industrials

15.9%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
7.3%

Basic Materials

7.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

7.1%
6.7%

Energy

5.2%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.8%
4.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.2%

Financial Services

IXUS
22.4%
ACWX
23.3%

Technology

IXUS
18.0%
ACWX
22.4%

Industrials

IXUS
15.9%
ACWX
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
8.3%
ACWX
7.3%

Basic Materials

IXUS
7.6%
ACWX
6.7%

Healthcare

IXUS
7.1%
ACWX
6.7%

Energy

IXUS
5.2%
ACWX
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
5.1%
ACWX
5.0%

Communication Services

IXUS
4.8%
ACWX
4.7%

Utilities

IXUS
3.2%
ACWX
2.8%

Real Estate

IXUS
2.5%
ACWX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXUSACWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.37

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

9.11

+0.04

IXUS vs. ACWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ACWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and ACWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXUSACWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.69

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.55

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.23

+0.25

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum ACWX drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and ACWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSACWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-60.40%

+24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.42%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-13.84%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-30.07%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-35.38%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-3.64%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-13.33%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.96%

-0.03%

Volatility

IXUS vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) have volatilities of 6.02% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSACWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

6.10%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

13.90%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

16.02%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

16.38%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

17.40%

-0.31%

IXUS vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than ACWX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.54%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.91%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, IXUS and ACWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to IXUS (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs ACWX's -60.40%.

On 10-year performance, IXUS leads with 9.68% vs 9.51% for ACWX. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.

IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.32% for ACWX.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and ACWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer