PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 10.55%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.


IXUS

1D
0.23%
1M
3.64%
YTD
16.32%
6M
16.81%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
10.55%

SCHF

1D
0.21%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.27%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
16.32%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
17.68%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and SCHF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.97

The correlation between IXUS and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXUS vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
SCHF

Technology

30.5%
17.6%

Financial Services

23.8%
23.3%

Industrials

11.3%
18.1%

Healthcare

6.5%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
7.3%

Basic Materials

5.0%
7.4%

Energy

4.4%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.7%

Utilities

1.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.0%

Technology

IXUS
30.5%
SCHF
17.6%

Financial Services

IXUS
23.8%
SCHF
23.3%

Industrials

IXUS
11.3%
SCHF
18.1%

Healthcare

IXUS
6.5%
SCHF
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
5.6%
SCHF
7.3%

Basic Materials

IXUS
5.0%
SCHF
7.4%

Energy

IXUS
4.4%
SCHF
4.7%

Communication Services

IXUS
4.2%
SCHF
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
3.9%
SCHF
5.7%

Utilities

IXUS
1.9%
SCHF
3.2%

Real Estate

IXUS
0.2%
SCHF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXUSSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.18

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.79

12.22

-0.43

IXUS vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-34.87%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.48%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-13.41%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-29.14%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-34.87%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-7.36%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.98%

-0.04%

Volatility

IXUS vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

6.42%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

14.43%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

16.63%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

16.55%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.21%

-0.11%

IXUS vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IXUS vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, which matches SCHF's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.88%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.90%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IXUS and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IXUS has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SCHF (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 11.18% vs 10.55% for IXUS. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IXUS.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.88% for IXUS.

IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer