PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 7.33%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.46% annualized return.


IFV

1D
-0.60%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.60%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
7.33%

TDIV

1D
-0.84%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
18.03%
6M
16.64%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
28.23%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
18.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
7.64%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%5.59%6.15%26.29%-20.44%32.58%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
18.03%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and TDIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2014

0.63

The correlation between IFV and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFV vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFV
TDIV

Industrials

30.7%
1.3%

Financial Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Basic Materials

9.8%

-

Technology

9.5%
87.1%

Energy

7.8%

-

Real Estate

5.8%

-

Utilities

5.1%

-

Healthcare

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%

-

Communication Services

2.5%
11.6%

Industrials

IFV
30.7%
TDIV
1.3%

Financial Services

IFV
11.2%
TDIV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IFV
10.0%
TDIV

-

Basic Materials

IFV
9.8%
TDIV

-

Technology

IFV
9.5%
TDIV
87.1%

Energy

IFV
7.8%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

IFV
5.8%
TDIV

-

Utilities

IFV
5.1%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

IFV
3.9%
TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

IFV
3.7%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

IFV
2.5%
TDIV
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFVTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.63

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

7.37

-1.41

IFV vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFV vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-31.97%

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-11.35%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-23.00%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.78%

-31.97%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-31.97%

-16.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-11.23%

+5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-4.85%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.04%

-0.61%

Volatility

IFV vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) is 7.43%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that IFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

10.24%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

15.69%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

20.01%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

20.97%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

20.96%

-0.35%

IFV vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than TDIV's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.85%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.23%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and TDIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to IFV (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.46% vs 7.33% for IFV. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IFV has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

IFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.23% for TDIV.

IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer