PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -8.71% return.


IFV

1D
-0.60%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.60%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
7.33%

IGLD

1D
-3.35%
1M
-11.16%
YTD
-8.71%
6M
-11.20%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
7.64%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%-0.37%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
-8.71%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and IGLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.28

Over the past year, IFV and IGLD have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFVIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.12

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.52

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

1.57

+4.39

IFV vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFV vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -23.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-23.84%

-25.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-23.84%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-23.84%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.78%

-23.84%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-23.84%

+17.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-5.38%

-7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

7.82%

-4.39%

Volatility

IFV vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) is 7.43%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that IFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

8.66%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

22.59%

-7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

24.64%

-7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

15.55%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

15.36%

+5.25%

IFV vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than IGLD's 19.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.85%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
19.96%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and IGLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLD has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to IFV (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs IGLD's -23.84%.

On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 11.90% vs 3.91% for IFV. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IFV has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.96%, compared with 1.85% for IFV.

IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IGLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.85% for IGLD.

IFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer