PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's -4.73% return.


IGLD

1D
-1.96%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-8.37%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*

IAU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-4.73%
6M
-8.68%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
18.02%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
-5.55%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-4.73%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD and IAU is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.93

The correlation between IGLD and IAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLDIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.88

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

2.37

-0.44

IGLD vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLD vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLDIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-45.14%

+23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.90%

-24.40%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-24.40%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-24.40%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-23.87%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-15.97%

+10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.68%

9.07%

-1.39%

Volatility

IGLD vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU) have volatilities of 8.14% and 8.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLDIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

8.10%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.34%

24.23%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.40%

27.38%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

18.18%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

15.98%

-0.68%

IGLD vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGLD vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.29%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
19.29%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IGLD and IAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IGLD has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to IAU (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -21.90% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 5-year performance, IAU leads with 18.02% vs 12.76% for IGLD. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAU has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 0.25% for IAU.

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer