IFV vs. FID
IFV (First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from First Trust - IFV tracks the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFV returned 4.76%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFV charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
IFV vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.
IFV
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IFV vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 12.94% | 32.26% | 0.33% | 20.45% | -25.39% | 5.59% | 6.15% | 26.29% | -16.92% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFV and FID is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IFV and FID shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IFV vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFV
FID
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Real Estate
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IFV
FID
Financial Services
IFV
FID
Basic Materials
IFV
FID
Consumer Cyclical
IFV
FID
Energy
IFV
FID
Technology
IFV
FID
Real Estate
IFV
FID
Utilities
IFV
FID
Healthcare
IFV
FID
Consumer Defensive
IFV
FID
Communication Services
IFV
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFV vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
IFV
FID
IFV vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.62 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 9.14 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.30 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.39 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IFV vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -39.79% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -8.93% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.66% | -10.97% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.32% | -29.13% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.11% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -8.47% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.55% | +0.77% |
Volatility
IFV vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 3.00% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 8.12% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 10.16% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 17.04% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 18.96% | +1.79% |
IFV vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFV vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.88% | 3.79% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 2.91% | 1.86% | 1.43% | 1.10% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFV and FID have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFV has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 4.76% for IFV. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.76% for IFV.
IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFV and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer