PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. FID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.


IFV

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.11%
YTD
12.94%
6M
16.30%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
7.10%

FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
12.94%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%5.59%6.15%26.29%-16.92%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and FID is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.64

The correlation between IFV and FID shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFV vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFV
FID

Industrials

31.1%
13.5%

Financial Services

11.6%
20.8%

Basic Materials

10.3%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
4.0%

Energy

8.5%
8.0%

Technology

7.5%
4.1%

Real Estate

6.1%
9.4%

Utilities

5.4%
17.4%

Healthcare

4.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.6%
11.5%

Industrials

IFV
31.1%
FID
13.5%

Financial Services

IFV
11.6%
FID
20.8%

Basic Materials

IFV
10.3%
FID
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IFV
9.3%
FID
4.0%

Energy

IFV
8.5%
FID
8.0%

Technology

IFV
7.5%
FID
4.1%

Real Estate

IFV
6.1%
FID
9.4%

Utilities

IFV
5.4%
FID
17.4%

Healthcare

IFV
4.0%
FID
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IFV
3.9%
FID
3.7%

Communication Services

IFV
2.6%
FID
11.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFVFIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.62

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

9.14

-0.17

IFV vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFVFIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.30

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.46

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.39

-0.15

Drawdowns

IFV vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and FID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVFIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-39.79%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-8.93%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-10.97%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.32%

-29.13%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.11%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-8.47%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.55%

+0.77%

Volatility

IFV vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVFIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

3.00%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

8.12%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

10.16%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

17.04%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

18.96%

+1.79%

IFV vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.76%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and FID have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFV has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs FID's -39.79%.

On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 4.76% for IFV. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.76% for IFV.

IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.60% for FID.

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and FID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer