PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FID vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FID vs. EFAV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index while EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FID returned 7.74%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for EFAV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.

Performance

FID vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 2.86% return.

FID

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
6.47%
6M
7.25%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
—

EFAV

1D
-0.35%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
2.86%
6M
3.20%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
6.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FID vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF		6.47%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-7.38%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF		2.86%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FID and EFAV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.74

The correlation between FID and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FID vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FID
EFAV

Financial Services

20.4%
19.4%

Utilities

16.3%
8.8%

Industrials

13.6%
15.9%

Communication Services

11.3%
9.6%

Real Estate

9.1%
3.0%

Energy

7.9%
8.3%

Technology

6.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
11.9%

Healthcare

3.4%
12.0%

Financial Services

FID
20.4%
EFAV
19.4%

Utilities

FID
16.3%
EFAV
8.8%

Industrials

FID
13.6%
EFAV
15.9%

Communication Services

FID
11.3%
EFAV
9.6%

Real Estate

FID
9.1%
EFAV
3.0%

Energy

FID
7.9%
EFAV
8.3%

Technology

FID
6.3%
EFAV
4.6%

Basic Materials

FID
4.4%
EFAV
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FID
3.8%
EFAV
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FID
3.7%
EFAV
11.9%

Healthcare

FID
3.4%
EFAV
12.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF

Often compared with FID:
FID vs. IGROFID vs. KNGFID vs. VIGFID vs. VIGIFID vs. FDFIXFID vs. BRK-BFID vs. VXUS
Often compared with EFAV:
EFAV vs. EFVEFAV vs. EFAEFAV vs. ACWVEFAV vs. EEMVEFAV vs. USMVEFAV vs. EFASEFAV vs. SPLV

Return for Risk

FID vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FID vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FIDEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.96
0.89

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.75
1.31

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.16

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.45

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

3.66

+4.15

FID vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FID Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FID and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FID vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and EFAV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FIDEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-27.56%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-6.49%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.97%

-8.75%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-27.46%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.56%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-6.49%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-4.77%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.58%

0.00%

Volatility

FID vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 3.10%. This indicates that FID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FIDEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.10%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

8.53%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

10.59%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

11.83%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

13.19%

+5.74%

FID vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FID vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than EFAV's 3.28% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF		3.28%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF		4.10%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FID and EFAV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FID has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to EFAV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 6.00% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 3.28% for EFAV.

FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.20% for EFAV.

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FID and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer