IFLR vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.

Performance

IFLR vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 6.90% return.

IFLR

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 4.93%
• 6M: 7.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 5.88%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	4.93%	4.20%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.90%	4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and QFLR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.66

IFLR vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFLR	QFLR
Financial Services	21.1%	0.9%
Industrials	17.4%	2.8%
Technology	11.4%	50.8%
Healthcare	9.6%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	9.2%
Basic Materials	5.7%	0.0%
Communication Services	3.9%	18.4%
Energy	3.7%	1.1%
Utilities	3.6%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

IFLR vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLR	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	1.40	+0.03

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLR	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-13.97%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-0.48%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-2.50%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLR	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	11.28%	+1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	12.62%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.07%	12.62%	+0.45%

IFLR vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IFLR and QFLR have an expense ratio of 0.89%.

Dividends

IFLR vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLR and QFLR in my portfolio?

IFLR and QFLR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IFLR or QFLR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLR or QFLR?

IFLR and QFLR have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLR or QFLR?

IFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

What is the main difference between IFLR and QFLR?

IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100.