IESC vs. EAT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, IESC returned 48.95%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for EAT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IESC vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 88.91% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 48.95%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.68% annualized return.

IESC

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 10.23%
• YTD: 88.91%
• 6M: 66.06%
• 1Y: 162.49%
• 3Y*: 140.27%
• 5Y*: 69.06%
• 10Y*: 48.95%

EAT

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: -14.86%
• 3Y*: 59.52%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESC vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	88.91%	93.58%	153.67%	122.72%	-29.76%	9.99%	79.42%	65.02%	-9.86%	-9.92%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	1.83%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and EAT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998	0.20

The correlation between IESC and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap IESC : $14.83B EAT : $6.50B
EPS IESC : $18.85 EAT : $10.14
PE Ratio IESC : 38.98 EAT : 14.41
PEG Ratio IESC : 0.47 EAT : 0.33
PS Ratio IESC : 4.08 EAT : 1.16
PB Ratio IESC : 13.83 EAT : 16.02
Total Revenue (TTM) IESC : $3.63B EAT : $5.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) IESC : $931.31M EAT : $3.45B
EBITDA (TTM) IESC : $487.14M EAT : $807.20M

Return for Risk

IESC vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC

IESC Risk / Return Rank: 92
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 29
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IESC	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	-0.32	+2.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	-0.17	+3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.98	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.50	-0.34	+7.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.33	-0.69	+22.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IESC vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and EAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IESC	EAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	-0.32	+2.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.29	0.37	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	0.25	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.28	-0.23

Drawdowns

IESC vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IESC	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.32%	-88.40%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.80%	-44.41%	+22.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.23%	-45.92%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.22%	-65.54%	+11.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.28%	-84.94%	+30.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-22.73%	+21.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.01%	-24.34%	-30.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.66%	21.68%	-14.02%

Volatility

IESC vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) is 11.77%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that IESC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IESC	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.77%	16.59%	-4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.79%	35.50%	+14.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.06%	46.55%	+15.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.94%	48.95%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.10%	55.09%	-6.99%

Dividends

IESC vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IESC nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

IESC vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IESC and EAT in my portfolio?

IESC and EAT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IESC or EAT?

EAT has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to IESC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs EAT's -88.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.