IESC vs. AZZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ).

Performance

IESC vs. AZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IESC vs. AZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	22.48%	93.58%	153.67%	122.72%	-29.76%	9.99%	79.42%	65.02%	-9.86%	-9.92%
AZZ AZZ Inc.	16.93%	31.89%	42.35%	46.82%	-26.09%	18.10%	5.34%	15.65%	-19.88%	-19.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IESC : $9.61B AZZ : $3.78B
EPS IESC : $19.53 AZZ : $10.64
PE Ratio IESC : 24.40 AZZ : 11.76
PEG Ratio IESC : 0.29 AZZ : 0.80
PS Ratio IESC : 2.75 AZZ : 2.34
PB Ratio IESC : 10.00 AZZ : 2.86
Total Revenue (TTM) IESC : $3.49B AZZ : $1.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) IESC : $901.48M AZZ : $386.08M
EBITDA (TTM) IESC : $451.44M AZZ : $550.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than AZZ's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed AZZ with an annualized return of 42.12%, while AZZ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.62% annualized return.

IESC

• 1D: 7.87%
• 1M: -3.81%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 6M: 19.82%
• 1Y: 188.58%
• 3Y*: 122.79%
• 5Y*: 54.89%
• 10Y*: 42.12%

AZZ

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -7.98%
• YTD: 16.93%
• 6M: 15.07%
• 1Y: 50.81%
• 3Y*: 46.27%
• 5Y*: 21.11%
• 10Y*: 9.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IESC vs. AZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC

IESC Risk / Return Rank: 95
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

AZZ

AZZ Risk / Return Rank: 83
AZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. AZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IESC	AZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.61	+1.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	2.35	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.53	2.76	+5.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.78	6.07	+17.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IESC vs. AZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the AZZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and AZZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IESC	AZZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	1.61	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.64	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.27	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.24	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and AZZ is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IESC vs. AZZ - Dividend Comparison

IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AZZ AZZ Inc.	0.62%	0.69%	0.83%	1.17%	1.69%	1.23%	1.43%	1.48%	1.68%	1.33%	0.97%	1.08%

Drawdowns

IESC vs. AZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than AZZ's maximum drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and AZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IESC	AZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.32%	-77.87%	-20.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.80%	-18.16%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.28%	-46.23%	-8.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.28%	-68.02%	+13.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.31%	-10.77%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-32.09%	-23.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	8.26%	-0.44%

Volatility

IESC vs. AZZ - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to AZZ Inc. (AZZ) at 10.38%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IESC	AZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.66%	10.38%	+12.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.66%	20.40%	+31.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.25%	31.78%	+32.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.08%	33.17%	+19.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.05%	35.44%	+12.61%

Financials

IESC vs. AZZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and AZZ Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 220.02M and revenue of 870.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

AZZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a gross profit of 101.94M and revenue of 425.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.73M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

AZZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AZZ Inc. reported an operating income of 69.48M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 144.35M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

AZZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a net income of 41.08M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.