IESC vs. ROAD

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IESC having a -19.57% return and ROAD slightly higher at -19.38%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the ROAD Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and ROAD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither IESC nor ROAD has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and ROAD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) at 16.66%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Construction Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.