IESC vs. ROAD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD).

Performance

IESC vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IESC vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	22.48%	93.58%	153.67%	122.72%	-29.76%	9.99%	79.42%	65.02%	-11.90%
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc.	2.37%	22.71%	103.26%	63.06%	-9.25%	1.03%	72.55%	91.05%	-27.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IESC : $9.61B ROAD : $6.23B
EPS IESC : $19.53 ROAD : $2.19
PE Ratio IESC : 24.40 ROAD : 50.85
PEG Ratio IESC : 0.29 ROAD : 0.94
PS Ratio IESC : 2.75 ROAD : 2.03
PB Ratio IESC : 10.00 ROAD : 6.43
Total Revenue (TTM) IESC : $3.49B ROAD : $3.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) IESC : $901.48M ROAD : $484.02M
EBITDA (TTM) IESC : $451.44M ROAD : $381.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than ROAD's 2.37% return.

IESC

• 1D: 7.87%
• 1M: -3.81%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 6M: 19.82%
• 1Y: 188.58%
• 3Y*: 122.79%
• 5Y*: 54.89%
• 10Y*: 42.12%

ROAD

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: -17.30%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: -12.50%
• 1Y: 54.61%
• 3Y*: 60.37%
• 5Y*: 30.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IESC vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC

IESC Risk / Return Rank: 95
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

ROAD

ROAD Risk / Return Rank: 76
ROAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ROAD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ROAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ROAD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IESC	ROAD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.19	+1.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	1.89	+1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.22	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.53	2.10	+6.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.78	4.55	+19.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IESC vs. ROAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the ROAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and ROAD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IESC	ROAD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	1.19	+1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.68	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.67	-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and ROAD is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IESC vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison

Neither IESC nor ROAD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IESC vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and ROAD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IESC	ROAD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.32%	-54.54%	-43.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.80%	-26.55%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.28%	-54.54%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.31%	-19.99%	+11.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-16.31%	-39.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	12.27%	-4.45%

Volatility

IESC vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) at 17.72%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IESC	ROAD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.66%	17.72%	+4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.66%	31.01%	+20.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.25%	46.05%	+18.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.08%	44.24%	+8.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.05%	48.43%	-0.38%

Financials

IESC vs. ROAD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and Construction Partners, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 220.02M and revenue of 870.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

ROAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.50M and revenue of 809.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.0%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.73M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

ROAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.41M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 144.35M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

ROAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 17.21M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.