IESC vs. FIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX).

Performance

IESC vs. FIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IESC vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	22.48%	93.58%	153.67%	122.72%	-29.76%	9.99%	79.42%	65.02%	-9.86%	-9.92%
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc.	47.83%	120.86%	106.89%	79.62%	16.98%	88.98%	6.73%	15.07%	0.73%	32.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IESC : $9.61B FIX : $48.70B
EPS IESC : $19.53 FIX : $28.93
PE Ratio IESC : 24.40 FIX : 47.67
PEG Ratio IESC : 0.29 FIX : 0.72
PS Ratio IESC : 2.75 FIX : 5.36
PB Ratio IESC : 10.00 FIX : 19.89
Total Revenue (TTM) IESC : $3.49B FIX : $9.10B
Gross Profit (TTM) IESC : $901.48M FIX : $2.20B
EBITDA (TTM) IESC : $451.44M FIX : $1.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 47.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 42.12%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.46% annualized return.

IESC

• 1D: 7.87%
• 1M: -3.81%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 6M: 19.82%
• 1Y: 188.58%
• 3Y*: 122.79%
• 5Y*: 54.89%
• 10Y*: 42.12%

FIX

• 1D: 8.31%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: 47.83%
• 6M: 67.30%
• 1Y: 329.03%
• 3Y*: 112.20%
• 5Y*: 79.33%
• 10Y*: 46.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IESC vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC

IESC Risk / Return Rank: 95
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FIX

FIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IESC	FIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	5.97	-3.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	5.33	-2.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.74	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.53	23.72	-15.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.78	80.80	-57.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IESC vs. FIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is lower than the FIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and FIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IESC	FIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	5.97	-3.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.82	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	1.11	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.38	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and FIX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IESC vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison

IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc.	0.16%	0.21%	0.28%	0.41%	0.49%	0.49%	0.81%	0.79%	0.76%	0.68%	0.83%	0.88%

Drawdowns

IESC vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than FIX's maximum drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and FIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IESC	FIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.32%	-93.36%	-4.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.80%	-13.77%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.28%	-46.05%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.28%	-49.68%	-4.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.31%	-6.23%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-38.30%	-17.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	4.04%	+3.78%

Volatility

IESC vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 20.47%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IESC	FIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.66%	20.47%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.66%	40.82%	+10.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.25%	55.55%	+8.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.08%	43.92%	+9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.05%	42.12%	+5.93%

Financials

IESC vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 220.02M and revenue of 870.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 674.72M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.5%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.73M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 426.74M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 144.35M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 330.81M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.