IDX vs. FLTR
IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Indonesia Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDX returned -3.79%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
IDX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -34.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of -3.79%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.49% annualized return.
IDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -34.83%
- 6M
- -35.84%
- 1Y
- -21.80%
- 3Y*
- -12.82%
- 5Y*
- -7.49%
- 10Y*
- -3.79%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
IDX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | -34.83% | 13.83% | -9.75% | 1.98% | -9.40% | -2.59% | -7.45% | 6.26% | -10.46% | 19.24% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDX and FLTR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
IDX
FLTR
IDX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 3.03 | -2.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 16.82 | -17.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 98.58 | -99.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -17.84% | -45.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.52% | -0.31% | -44.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.73% | -1.93% | -44.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.25% | -3.06% | -48.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.11% | -17.84% | -41.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.80% | -0.00% | -55.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -0.67% | -24.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.47% | 0.05% | +15.42% |
Volatility
IDX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 0.29% | +13.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.92% | 0.66% | +24.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.38% | 0.80% | +26.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 2.13% | +18.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 5.00% | +19.47% |
IDX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | 3.20% | 2.08% | 4.01% | 3.62% | 3.64% | 1.08% | 1.66% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.16% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDX and FLTR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDX has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 10-year performance, FLTR leads with 3.49% vs -3.79% for IDX. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 3.49% return vs -3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.20% for IDX.
IDX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDX and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer