IDX vs. VNM
IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and VNM (VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDX is a Indonesia Equities fund tracking the MVIS Indonesia Index, while VNM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Vietnam Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDX returned -5.12%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for VNM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for VNM.
Performance
IDX vs. VNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -36.95% return, which is significantly lower than VNM's -8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed VNM with an annualized return of -5.12%, while VNM has yielded a comparatively higher 2.69% annualized return.
IDX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- 6M
- -37.92%
- YTD
- -36.95%
- 1Y
- -28.33%
- 3Y*
- -14.88%
- 5Y*
- -7.53%
- 10Y*
- -5.12%
VNM
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -10.88%
- YTD
- -8.12%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
IDX vs. VNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | -36.95% | 13.83% | -9.75% | 1.98% | -9.40% | -2.59% | -7.45% | 6.26% | -10.46% | 19.24% |
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | -8.12% | 66.55% | -11.15% | 15.01% | -43.74% | 22.05% | 9.84% | 9.24% | -16.83% | 38.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDX and VNM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2009 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDX and VNM has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDX vs. VNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDX
VNM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
IDX
VNM
Basic Materials
IDX
VNM
Consumer Defensive
IDX
VNM
Energy
IDX
VNM
Communication Services
IDX
VNM
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDX
VNM
-
Industrials
IDX
VNM
Utilities
IDX
VNM
Healthcare
IDX
VNM
-
Real Estate
IDX
VNM
Technology
IDX
VNM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDX vs. VNM — Risk / Return Rank
IDX
VNM
IDX vs. VNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDX | VNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.12 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 0.91 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 2.15 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDX vs. VNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, roughly equal to the maximum VNM drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and VNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDX | VNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -63.19% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.52% | -17.07% | -27.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.73% | -31.60% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.25% | -49.95% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.11% | -51.67% | -7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.24% | -28.45% | -28.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -37.76% | +12.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.00% | 7.18% | +10.82% |
Volatility
IDX vs. VNM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) at 6.34%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDX | VNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 6.34% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.77% | 17.51% | +8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.06% | 26.84% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 24.32% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 23.43% | +1.05% |
IDX vs. VNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than VNM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDX vs. VNM - Dividend Comparison
IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than VNM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | 3.30% | 2.08% | 4.01% | 3.62% | 3.64% | 1.08% | 1.66% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.16% | 2.43% |
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 5.21% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.40% | 0.76% | 0.83% | 1.14% | 2.44% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDX and VNM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDX has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to VNM (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs VNM's -63.19%.
On 10-year performance, VNM leads with 2.69% vs -5.12% for IDX. On fees, IDX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, VNM has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VNM has performed better with a 2.69% return vs -5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.
IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.22% for VNM.
IDX is categorized as Indonesia Equities, while VNM is Asia Pacific Equities. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.68% for VNM.
VNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDX and VNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer