PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDX vs. VNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDX vs. VNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -33.62% return, which is significantly lower than VNM's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed VNM with an annualized return of -5.23%, while VNM has yielded a comparatively higher 3.26% annualized return.


IDX

1D
0.64%
1M
9.05%
6M
-27.51%
YTD
-33.62%
1Y
-26.86%
3Y*
-12.88%
5Y*
-7.01%
10Y*
-5.23%
ALL TIME*
3.76%

VNM

1D
3.06%
1M
-5.35%
6M
-6.77%
YTD
-8.28%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
-1.14%
10Y*
3.26%
ALL TIME*
-0.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.10M$722.78K$941.75K
$13.14M$11.75M$11.73M

IDX vs. VNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
-33.62%13.83%-9.75%1.98%-9.40%-2.59%-7.45%6.26%-10.46%19.24%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
-8.28%66.55%-11.15%15.01%-43.74%22.05%9.84%9.24%-16.83%38.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IDX and VNM is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2009

0.37

The correlation between IDX and VNM shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDX vs. VNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDX
VNM

Financial Services

27.3%
32.7%

Basic Materials

20.9%
7.0%

Industrials

13.0%
14.3%

Energy

11.0%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
14.3%

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Utilities

4.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
24.8%

Healthcare

1.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
2.2%

Technology

0.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

IDX
27.3%
VNM
32.7%

Basic Materials

IDX
20.9%
VNM
7.0%

Industrials

IDX
13.0%
VNM
14.3%

Energy

IDX
11.0%
VNM
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

IDX
10.1%
VNM
14.3%

Communication Services

IDX
8.3%
VNM

-

Utilities

IDX
4.2%
VNM
0.9%

Real Estate

IDX
1.9%
VNM
24.8%

Healthcare

IDX
1.8%
VNM

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDX
1.5%
VNM
2.2%

Technology

IDX
0.2%
VNM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDX vs. VNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDX
IDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDX vs. VNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDXVNMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.08

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

0.57

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

1.25

-2.58

IDX vs. VNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the VNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDX and VNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDX vs. VNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, roughly equal to the maximum VNM drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and VNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDXVNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-63.19%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.52%

-17.47%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.73%

-31.60%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.25%

-49.95%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

-51.67%

-7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.98%

-28.57%

-26.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-37.73%

+12.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.14%

7.98%

+12.16%

Volatility

IDX vs. VNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is 7.49%, while VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that IDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDXVNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

8.83%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.55%

18.63%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.56%

26.88%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

24.49%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

23.53%

+1.01%

IDX vs. VNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than VNM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDX vs. VNM - Dividend Comparison

IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than VNM's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
3.14%2.08%4.01%3.62%3.64%1.08%1.66%2.21%2.19%1.85%1.16%2.43%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.22%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDX and VNM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNM has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to IDX (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs VNM's -63.19%.

On 10-year performance, VNM leads with 3.26% vs -5.23% for IDX. On fees, IDX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, IDX has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VNM has performed better with a 3.26% return vs -5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.

IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.22% for VNM.

IDX is categorized as Indonesia Equities, while VNM is Asia Pacific Equities. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.68% for VNM.

VNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDX and VNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer