PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDX vs. EDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDX vs. EDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -34.04% return, which is significantly lower than EDOG's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed EDOG with an annualized return of -5.18%, while EDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.78% annualized return.


IDX

1D
0.00%
1M
8.36%
6M
-30.24%
YTD
-34.04%
1Y
-27.33%
3Y*
-13.24%
5Y*
-6.84%
10Y*
-5.18%
ALL TIME*
3.73%

EDOG

1D
-0.30%
1M
4.11%
6M
-1.88%
YTD
4.93%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
5.78%
ALL TIME*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.67K$61.90K$58.74K
$1.09M$723.63K$937.72K

IDX vs. EDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
-34.04%13.83%-9.75%1.98%-9.40%-2.59%-7.45%6.26%-10.46%19.24%
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.93%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%13.26%-16.52%20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IDX and EDOG is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.61

The correlation between IDX and EDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDX vs. EDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDX
EDOG

Financial Services

27.3%
8.0%

Basic Materials

20.9%
9.7%

Industrials

13.0%
11.6%

Energy

11.0%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
10.3%

Communication Services

8.3%
9.8%

Utilities

4.2%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Healthcare

1.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
8.3%

Technology

0.2%
9.8%

Financial Services

IDX
27.3%
EDOG
8.0%

Basic Materials

IDX
20.9%
EDOG
9.7%

Industrials

IDX
13.0%
EDOG
11.6%

Energy

IDX
11.0%
EDOG
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

IDX
10.1%
EDOG
10.3%

Communication Services

IDX
8.3%
EDOG
9.8%

Utilities

IDX
4.2%
EDOG
8.1%

Real Estate

IDX
1.9%
EDOG

-

Healthcare

IDX
1.8%
EDOG
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IDX
1.5%
EDOG
8.3%

Technology

IDX
0.2%
EDOG
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDX vs. EDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDX
IDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDX vs. EDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDXEDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.21

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.63

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

3.56

-4.87

IDX vs. EDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the EDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDX and EDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDX vs. EDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than EDOG's maximum drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and EDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDXEDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-44.29%

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.52%

-10.73%

-33.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.73%

-15.29%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.25%

-26.54%

-24.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

-44.29%

-14.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.27%

-6.61%

-48.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-11.18%

-13.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.01%

4.90%

+15.11%

Volatility

IDX vs. EDOG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) at 3.19%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDXEDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

3.19%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.54%

14.06%

+8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.59%

16.04%

+12.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

15.40%

+5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

17.35%

+7.18%

IDX vs. EDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than EDOG's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDX vs. EDOG - Dividend Comparison

IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than EDOG's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.90%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
3.16%2.08%4.01%3.62%3.64%1.08%1.66%2.21%2.19%1.85%1.16%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDX and EDOG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDX has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to EDOG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs EDOG's -44.29%.

On 10-year performance, EDOG leads with 5.78% vs -5.18% for IDX. On fees, IDX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDOG has performed better with a 5.78% return vs -5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EDOG.

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.16% for IDX.

IDX is categorized as Indonesia Equities, while EDOG is Emerging Markets Equities. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.60% for EDOG.

EDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDX and EDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer