ICOW vs. SPDW
ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index while SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICOW returned 10.06%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for SPDW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
ICOW vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 17.35% return, which is significantly higher than SPDW's 15.00% return.
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDW
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
ICOW vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.98% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 15.00% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOW and SPDW is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ICOW and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICOW vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICOW
SPDW
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ICOW
SPDW
Energy
ICOW
SPDW
Consumer Cyclical
ICOW
SPDW
Communication Services
ICOW
SPDW
Consumer Defensive
ICOW
SPDW
Healthcare
ICOW
SPDW
Technology
ICOW
SPDW
Basic Materials
ICOW
SPDW
Financial Services
ICOW
-
SPDW
Real Estate
ICOW
-
SPDW
Utilities
ICOW
-
SPDW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOW vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
ICOW
SPDW
ICOW vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICOW | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.80 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 10.93 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICOW | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.07 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.57 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.24 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
ICOW vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOW | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -60.02% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -11.55% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -13.53% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.48% | -30.21% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.87% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -12.91% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.95% | -0.71% |
Volatility
ICOW vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) is 4.41%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that ICOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOW | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.63% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 13.17% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 15.60% | -1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 16.49% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 17.26% | +1.21% |
ICOW vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOW vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOW and SPDW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 9.38% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.
ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.04% for SPDW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICOW and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer