ICBMX vs. RSPM
Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM).
ICBMX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 4, 1997. RSPM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006.
Performance
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 15.65% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 14.63% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -9.95% | 31.21% | 22.77% | 25.11% | -14.75% | 25.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICBMX achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than RSPM's 14.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ICBMX has outperformed RSPM with an annualized return of 13.20%, while RSPM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.
ICBMX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
RSPM
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 20.87%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICBMX vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank
ICBMX
RSPM
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICBMX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.09 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 1.66 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.60 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 5.27 | +5.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICBMX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.09 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.33 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.51 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.39 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICBMX and RSPM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison
ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than RSPM's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.65% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.51% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPM drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and RSPM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICBMX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.92% | -61.18% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -15.67% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -27.19% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.18% | -39.84% | -8.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -5.08% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -8.83% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.75% | -1.04% |
Volatility
ICBMX vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) at 6.20%. This indicates that ICBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICBMX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 6.20% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 13.59% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 22.71% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.12% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 21.91% | +0.38% |