RSPM vs. SPY
RSPM (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPM is a Materials fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPM returned 11.03%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
RSPM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPM achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.03%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
RSPM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
RSPM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 15.80% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -9.95% | 31.21% | 22.77% | 25.11% | -14.75% | 25.87% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPM and SPY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPM and SPY has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPM
SPY
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
RSPM
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
RSPM
SPY
Industrials
RSPM
SPY
Financial Services
RSPM
SPY
Communication Services
RSPM
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
RSPM
-
SPY
Energy
RSPM
-
SPY
Healthcare
RSPM
-
SPY
Real Estate
RSPM
-
SPY
Technology
RSPM
-
SPY
Utilities
RSPM
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
RSPM
SPY
RSPM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.01 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 13.54 | -8.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPM drawdown since its inception was -61.18%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.18% | -55.19% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -8.88% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.19% | -18.76% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -24.50% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.84% | -33.72% | -6.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | -1.75% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -9.04% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 1.97% | +2.64% |
Volatility
RSPM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that RSPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.64% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.05% | 9.75% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 12.43% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 17.14% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 17.99% | +3.99% |
RSPM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
RSPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 2.20% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPM and SPY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPM dropped -61.18% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 11.03% for RSPM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPM.
RSPM has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
RSPM is categorized as Materials, while SPY is S&P 500. RSPM tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPM and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer