RSPM vs. XLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB).
RSPM and XLB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. XLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Materials Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both RSPM and XLB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPM or XLB.
Correlation
The correlation between RSPM and XLB is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPM vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RSPM:
-0.10
XLB:
0.02
RSPM:
-0.04
XLB:
0.13
RSPM:
1.00
XLB:
1.01
RSPM:
-0.12
XLB:
0.02
RSPM:
-0.39
XLB:
0.08
RSPM:
4.00%
XLB:
3.85%
RSPM:
15.12%
XLB:
13.54%
RSPM:
-61.18%
XLB:
-59.83%
RSPM:
-12.32%
XLB:
-12.54%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPM achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPM has outperformed XLB with an annualized return of 8.76%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.81% annualized return.
RSPM
-0.64%
-9.82%
-3.98%
-1.25%
9.42%
8.76%
XLB
1.10%
-9.46%
-2.88%
0.70%
9.00%
7.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPM vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPM vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPM vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
RSPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than XLB's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 2.03% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.29% | 1.57% | 1.45% | 1.36% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
RSPM vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPM drawdown since its inception was -61.18%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPM and XLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPM vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 3.78%. This indicates that RSPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.