RSPM vs. VTV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).
RSPM and VTV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both RSPM and VTV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPM or VTV.
Correlation
The correlation between RSPM and VTV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPM vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RSPM:
-0.06
VTV:
1.63
RSPM:
0.02
VTV:
2.33
RSPM:
1.00
VTV:
1.29
RSPM:
-0.07
VTV:
2.27
RSPM:
-0.24
VTV:
8.45
RSPM:
3.97%
VTV:
2.00%
RSPM:
15.11%
VTV:
10.35%
RSPM:
-61.18%
VTV:
-59.27%
RSPM:
-11.83%
VTV:
-5.54%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPM achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPM has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 8.83%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.
RSPM
-0.09%
-9.35%
-3.36%
-1.03%
9.54%
8.83%
VTV
16.98%
-5.27%
7.98%
16.91%
10.12%
9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPM vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPM vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPM vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
RSPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than VTV's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 2.02% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.29% | 1.57% | 1.45% | 1.36% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 2.29% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% | 2.22% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
RSPM vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPM drawdown since its inception was -61.18%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPM and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPM vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.33%. This indicates that RSPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.