IBDR vs. IBND
IBDR (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF) and IBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBDR tracks the Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index while IBND tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDR returned 1.55%/yr vs -1.32%/yr for IBND. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBND.
Performance
IBDR vs. IBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDR achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than IBND's -0.64% return.
IBDR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
IBND
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- 0.69%
IBDR vs. IBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 1.48% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 5.96% | -8.28% | -1.79% | 8.88% | 14.81% | -2.80% | 5.96% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | -0.64% | 16.17% | -2.81% | 10.38% | -19.44% | -8.40% | 11.50% | 4.41% | -6.15% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDR and IBND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2016 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBDR and IBND has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDR vs. IBND — Risk / Return Rank
IBDR
IBND
IBDR vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDR | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.02 | 0.36 | +6.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.88 | 0.58 | +14.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.49 | 1.07 | +2.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 53.86 | 0.51 | +53.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 188.75 | 1.41 | +187.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDR | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.02 | 0.36 | +6.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.14 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.16 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
IBDR vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum IBND drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and IBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDR | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -35.62% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -6.75% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -9.18% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.13% | -34.32% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.05% | +9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -10.64% | +7.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 2.45% | -2.43% |
Volatility
IBDR vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.15%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDR | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 2.05% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.34% | 6.13% | -5.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 7.98% | -7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.40% | 9.75% | -6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 8.94% | -4.07% |
IBDR vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDR vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison
IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than IBND's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.13% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.41% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.61% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.73% | 2.49% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDR and IBND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBND has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to IBDR (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDR dropped -16.06% vs IBND's -35.62%.
On 5-year performance, IBDR leads with 1.55% vs -1.32% for IBND. On fees, IBDR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBDR has performed better with a 1.55% return vs -1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.
IBDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.73% for IBND.
IBDR tracks Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index, while IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDR and 0.50% for IBND.
IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.02 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDR and IBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer